WATCH: ‘Washington Post Live’ Segment Devolves Into Chaos As Conservative Guest Leaves Mid-Segment

During a Washington Post Live segment, commentator Hugh Hewitt stormed out mid-conversation after a fiery debate over the upcoming election. Upset by mischaracterizations of former President Donald Trump, Hewitt, who previously worked for The Washington Post, confronted Post journalists Jonathan Capehart and Ruth Marcus, leading to a tense standoff that ended with Hewitt ripping off his headset and exiting the live broadcast.

The segment began with Jonathan Capehart suggesting that Trump was “laying the groundwork for contesting the election” by raising concerns over election integrity in Pennsylvania. He specifically referenced Trump’s recent lawsuit against Bucks County, alleging irregularities. Adding fuel to the fire, Ruth Marcus, an opinion writer, chimed in with a dismissive take on Trump’s continued legal efforts, implying he was incapable of accepting defeat.

“No election can be fair in Donald Trump’s mind unless Donald Trump wins it,” she stated. “I think we are going to see him both rev up his supporters to contest elections outside of courtrooms, and go to every courtroom he can in America where it’s relevant to make whatever arguments he can, no matter how far-fetched,” Marcus speculated.

For Hewitt, the commentary from Capehart and Marcus was too much. Attempting to interject, Hewitt voiced his frustration at the one-sided narrative, saying, “Well, I’ve just got to say, we’re news people, even though we’re at the opinion section. It’s got to be reported.” Hewitt was quick to highlight that Bucks County’s legal issues did, in fact, lead to a court ruling, validating concerns raised by Trump and the Republican National Committee.

WATCH:

“The Supreme Court ruled that Glenn Youngkin was successful,” Hewitt insisted, explaining his point that these concerns were more than just “far-fetched” claims. “We have to report the whole story if we bring up part of the story,” he argued, clearly irritated.

However, Capehart pushed back, questioning Hewitt’s stance on “reporting the whole story” and accusing him of selectively using facts to bolster his perspective. “I don’t appreciate being lectured about reporting when, Hugh, many times you come here saying lots of things that aren’t-,” Capehart replied, further escalating the tension.

The heated exchange culminated in Hewitt’s departure from the segment, with him stating, “This is the most unfair election ad I have ever been a part of. You guys are working. That’s fine. I’m done.” Ripping off his headset, he exited the live segment, leaving Capehart and Marcus to continue the discussion.

This comes after the Trump campaign scored a legal victory in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, after filing a lawsuit over alleged voter suppression during early voting. The campaign alleged that officials shut down voter lines hours before the deadline, leaving many residents unable to apply for mail-in ballots in person. The Bucks County Court of Common Pleas ruled in favor of the Trump campaign, extending early voting hours to accommodate those affected.

The lawsuit was filed Tuesday night against the Bucks County Board of Elections, claiming that voters were “turned away” while trying to apply for mail-in ballots at local election offices. According to the 21-page filing, security personnel reportedly forced voters to leave the premises, violating Pennsylvania’s election code. The Trump campaign demanded an extension to the original deadline, which was set for 5 p.m. Tuesday, to allow in-person mail-in ballot requests until the end of the day on Wednesday, according to ABC News.

On Tuesday, voters faced waits of up to three hours. According to the lawsuit, those still waiting in line at 5 p.m. were instructed to leave. The legal action was supported by various Republican organizations and figures, including the Republican National Committee, the Republican Party of Pennsylvania, and Senate candidate David McCormick. The lawsuit featured signed declarations from three voters who claimed they were removed from long lines by security officials, asserting that the sudden closures infringed upon their right to vote.

(POLL: Should Pelosi Be Banned From Trading Stocks?)