REPORT: Dejected DC Journalists Wondering Whether They Can Handle Second Trump Term

In the wake of Donald Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election, many Washington, D.C., journalists are grappling with a sense of fatigue and uncertainty. The prospect of covering a second Trump administration has left some members of the press wondering if they have the stamina to endure another four years of high-stakes, often confrontational reporting.

Prominent media reporter Brian Stelter captured this sentiment on social media, sharing insights from a conversation with a talent agent. Stelter posted, “Will there be a journalistic brain drain in DC? A talent agent said what I’ve also heard anecdotally: A lot of reporters are ‘questioning if they have it in them to report on another Trump cycle.’”

Will there be a journalistic brain drain in DC? A talent agent said what I’ve also heard anecdotally: A lot of reporters are “questioning if they have it in them to report on another Trump cycle.”

— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) November 7, 2024

For many journalists, Trump’s first term from 2017 to 2021 was a whirlwind of constant headlines, press briefings, and political upheaval. Trump’s unique style of communication, including his frequent use of social media to bypass traditional outlets, often left reporters scrambling to keep up with his next move. With Trump set to be inaugurated in January 2025, some are already questioning whether they are ready to jump back into the fast-paced and sometimes combative environment that characterized Trump’s previous administration.

Adding to the exhaustion is what some journalists have described as a more polarized media landscape. Mainstream outlets are heavily biased against Trump, with some outlets facing accusations of publishing disproportionate criticism or coverage of Trump-related stories.

During Donald Trump’s first term, he had numerous memorable and often contentious exchanges with journalists, which defined his relationship with the media. Trump’s unfiltered approach and willingness to push back against journalists created a new kind of media environment in Washington, D.C.

One of Trump’s most high-profile clashes was with CNN’s Jim Acosta. In a 2018 press conference, Acosta challenged Trump’s claims on immigration and the migrant caravan, prompting Trump to call him a “rude, terrible person.” Later, the White House temporarily revoked Acosta’s press credentials, leading to a legal challenge by CNN that resulted in their reinstatement. The incident highlighted Trump’s contentious relationship with CNN and set a precedent for his approach to critics in the media.

Trump frequently clashed with NBC News, including in an exchange in 2020 with Peter Alexander during a COVID-19 press briefing. When Alexander asked Trump about Americans feeling scared amid the pandemic, Trump accused him of being “a terrible reporter” and slammed the question as “very nasty.”

In a notable 2020 “60 Minutes” interview, Trump abruptly ended the interview after sparring with Lesley Stahl. He criticized her questioning as biased and later released his own recording of the exchange before CBS aired it. Trump also frequently targeted Maggie Haberman, a New York Times White House correspondent, often labeling her work as “fake news.”  In a heated 2020 briefing, Trump clashed with Jonathan Karl, calling him “third-rate” after Karl pressed him on certain administration claims. Karl later wrote a book on his experience covering Trump, detailing the often intense and unpredictable nature of the press conferences.

While some in Washington’s press corps may be considering stepping back, others seem prepared to take on the challenge, viewing the Trump administration’s second term as an opportunity to reinforce the role of a free press in a democratic society.

YOURS FREE: Claim Your ‘Trump Victory’ Coin NOW!