Connect with us

Politics

BREAKING: Plot To Launder 100s Of Millions Of Taxpayer Dollars Through Biden Campaign Is Revealed

Published

on

A newly declassified intelligence summary alleges a stunning plan to divert hundreds of millions in U.S. taxpayer funds meant for Ukraine into Democratic political coffers, a claim that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is now pressing federal agencies to scrutinize, with a possible criminal referral to the FBI on the table.

Gabbard recently learned of the intercepts and has asked U.S. Agency for International Development officials to scour records to determine whether the alleged scheme was carried out and whether investigators should be brought in, officials familiar with the matter told Just the News.

Gabbard’s team has not found substantive evidence that the intercepted allegations were thoroughly investigated during the Biden administration, and officials said the communications are not believed to be tied to Russian disinformation efforts.

The declassified report is described as a summary of raw intercepts collected by U.S. spy agencies in late 2022. Officials who reviewed the files said the explosive allegation drew surprisingly little follow-up inside the government at the time.

At the center of the report is an accusation that U.S. foreign aid and contracting channels were being used as a political pipeline.

“The Ukrainian Government and unspecified U.S. Government personnel, through USAID in Kyiv, reportedly developed a plan that would provide hundreds of millions of US taxpayer dollars to fund an infrastructure project for Ukraine that would be used as a cover to send approximately 90% of funds allocated to the DNC to fund Joe Biden’s reelection campaign,” the declassified summary stated.

“They were confident the project would be funded initially, even though at some time in the future the project would be disapproved as unnecessary. At this time, the money would already be allocated and impossible to return or use for a different purpose,” the report added.

The summary said the alleged plan relied on subcontracting and layers of funding to make tracing the money difficult. The intercepts referenced two American subcontractors as possible recipients of money that would later be moved to Democratic coffers, officials said, but the names remain redacted in the declassified version because they appear in still-classified raw intelligence.

“The plan included details of how subcontractors would be funded through U.S. companies so that how the funds were spent and allocated would be difficult to track,” the declassified summary stated. “Additionally, contracts would be executed that would be difficult to verify. In this manner, most of the U.S. funding would be diverted to Joe Biden’s election campaign without the ability to track where exactly the funds came from.”

The allegation lands at a delicate moment for Ukraine’s leadership, as President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been working with President Donald Trump’s envoys on a peace plan to end the war triggered by Russia’s 2022 invasion. Even as the Trump administration has praised certain Ukrainian concessions, Kyiv continues to face recurring allegations of corruption.

The report also re-ignites long-running scrutiny over Ukraine-linked controversies that dogged the Biden era, including the Burisma saga and questions raised by Republicans about influence peddling. Those battles intensified after then-President Joe Biden issued a sweeping pardon for his son in late 2024, covering any “offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014, through December 1, 2024.”

In parallel, the declassified intercept summary is now driving a separate question: why the allegation did not trigger a visible, aggressive federal response when it surfaced.

If Gabbard’s record search uncovers contracts, payments or internal communications matching the outlines described in the summary, officials said it could spur a criminal referral and broaden scrutiny of how taxpayer-backed foreign aid programs were administered, and whether political operatives tried to game the system under the cover of overseas “infrastructure” spending.

Download the FREE Trending Politics App to get the latest news FIRST >>