Connect with us

Politics

BREAKING: Trump Attorneys Release Massive Statement After Media Tour By Head Juror in Georgia Case

Published

2 years ago

on

The grand jury foreperson in the Trump investigation, Emily Kohrs, went on a media tour over the last week to give her take on the investigation in Georgia. Not only did her interviews suggest bias against former President Trump, it was revealed she is a supporter of witchcraft, based on her social media activity.

On Thursday, attorneys Jennifer Little, Drew Findling and Marissa Goldberg, who represent former President Trump in Fulton County, gave the following statement:

“The media tour undertaken by the foreperson of the grand jury may have been surprising to some because of its unprecedented nature, but, in reality, was emblematic of the deeply flawed process that took place over the last seven months. As counsel to President Trump, we have remained mostly quiet but have consistently noted the problems with this grand jury proceeding, ranging from questionable to downright unconstitutional. The lens now provided by this foreperson into the lack of seriousness and respect for this process that existed behind the grand jury walls is truly shocking to the legal conscience.

What we have seen over the past 48-hours proves that whatever conclusions were drawn were not the result of an analytical, trustworthy, or credible investigation as one would expect in a matter of historic proportion such as this.”

SEE BELOW:

Kohrs, was seen laughing during media appearances earlier this week. Critics of the grand jury’s investigation saw Kohrs’ demeanor as evidence of bias against Trump and his allies.

Supporters of the investigation noted that Kohrs was not authorized to speak about the grand jury’s findings and that her demeanor was irrelevant to the investigation’s outcome. The grand jury’s report remains sealed, and it is not yet clear whether any charges will be pursued.

Many people have criticized Emily Kohrs, the forewoman of the grand jury investigating former President Donald Trump for speaking to the media about the investigation. Her interviews could be used by Trump’s defense team that might indicate a bias against the former president.

free hat

Some have suggested that it would have been wiser for Kohrs to wait until after any potential indictments before speaking out. It is important to remember that Kohrs was not authorized to discuss the grand jury’s findings and that her demeanor during media appearances could be used to draw conclusions about the investigation’s validity. The decision to pursue charges based on the grand jury’s findings remains in the hands of the district attorney, and it is unclear whether any charges will be filed.

WATCH:

On Thursday it was revealed that Kohrs had a shocking Pinterest account that delves into the world of witchcraft and magic spells.

Kohrs had a board on the social media platform that promotes literature on “Wicca, Witchcraft & Paganism” alongside multiple pins dedicated to spell casting. The board’s contents are drawing attention and raising questions about the impartiality of the grand jury investigation.

A Pinterest post from two years ago that includes a pentagram – a modern symbol of occultism, suggested that witches can protect themselves during their magic work by casting a circle. In another post, she recommended that “beginner witches” start by acquiring items such as sea salt, rosemary, quartz, and incense to begin practicing their craft. These revelations are causing concern and raising questions about the impartiality of the grand jury’s investigation.

Supporters of the investigation noted that Kohrs was not authorized to speak about the grand jury’s findings and that her demeanor was irrelevant to the investigation’s outcome. The grand jury’s report remains sealed, and it is not yet be pursued.

Many people have criticized Emily Kohrs, the forewoman of the grand jury investigating former President Donald Trump for speaking to the media about the investigation. Her interviews could be used by Trump’s defense team that might indicate a bias against the former president.

Some have suggested that it would have been wiser for Kohrs to wait until after any potential indictments before speaking out. It is important to remember that Kohrs was not authorized to discuss the grand jury’s findings and that her demeanor during media appearances could be used to draw conclusions about the investigation’s validity. The decision to pursue charges based on the grand jury’s findings remains in the hands of the district attorney, and it is unclear whether any charges will be filed.



Related Topics: