Harmeet Dhillon Reveals Judge Juan Merchan’s Sneaky Move To RIG Trump’s Trial

In an explosive appearance on the Megyn Kelly Show, Harmeet Dhillon, an attorney closely associated with former President Donald Trump’s legal affairs, vehemently criticized Judge Juan Merchan’s conduct in Trump’s ongoing hush money trial. Dhillon has been actively involved in high-profile legal cases, such as defending Project Veritas and participating in election integrity efforts during the 2020 presidential election​.

According to Dhillon, Merchan has made the controversial decision to exclude campaign finance experts from testifying, a move she argued could unfairly impact the trial’s outcome. As the case is set to resume Tuesday in Manhattan, concerns over judicial fairness have intensified. Dhillon described the situation that has been compromised by biased judicial oversight.

“So it is actually an open and shut case. And what the judge did in this case, Judge Merchant, is outrageous. He has prevented President Trump from bringing in campaign finance experts who would have advised the court that there is no campaign finance violation here.” Dhillon said to Kelly.

“And my God, we have limited time here, but I could go on of the number of reversible errors this judge has committed. That is but one of many.”

WATCH:

Trump team prevented from having campaign finance experts testify on a case about campaign finances.
This trial is that rigged.
Credit: @pnjaban @megynkelly pic.twitter.com/iEOum6eynG

— Big Fish (@BigFish3000) April 26, 2024

Trump has been formally charged with allegedly falsifying business records connected to hush money payments made during his 2016 presidential campaign. These payments were reportedly intended to prevent revelations of extramarital affairs. The proceedings, overseen by Judge Merchan, are moving forward after multiple unsuccessful efforts by Trump’s legal team to delay or dismiss the charges.

In their opening statements, the prosecution described an alleged conspiracy beginning with a 2015 meeting that included Donald Trump, Michael Cohen, and David Pecker, aimed at suppressing damaging stories. The defense, however, contended that the payments in question were legitimate legal expenses. They argued that Trump’s actions were intended to protect his personal and family interests, rather than to interfere with electoral processes. This strategy seeks to distinguish Trump’s actions from any form of electoral malfeasance.

The prosecution’s case relies heavily on the testimony of Michael Cohen, Trump’s former attorney, whose credibility has been under a microscope. The defense is actively seeking to challenge Cohen’s reliability, pointing to his past legal issues and what they characterize as a personal vendetta against Trump. Judge Merchan is strictly overseeing Trump’s robust public and social media commentary, which has sparked concerns about potential jury tampering and the public’s perception of the trial. Trump’s trial unfolds against the backdrop of his ongoing presidential campaign, infusing the proceedings with heightened political tension. Trump has been vocal in his criticism of the judicial process, suggesting that he views the trial as politically motivated.

Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday: “What Crooked Joe Biden is doing with all of these ridiculous D.C. inspired lawsuits against me is, and make no mistake about it, ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!! Drop the lawsuits, Joe, and maybe you’ll do better than you are doing now!!!”

As the trial progresses, all eyes will be on Judge Merchan’s courtroom, where the legal strategies of Trump’s defense team will face the challenges posed by what Dhillon has branded a “rigged” process.