J6 Political Prisoners File Landmark $50 Billion Lawsuit Against DOJ

Over 100 individuals incarcerated for their roles in the Capitol protests have come together to launch an unprecedented $50 billion class-action lawsuit against the Department of Justice (DOJ). In a legal battle set to reshape the narrative surrounding January 6, the lawsuit described as historic in scope and ambition, seeks restitution for what the plaintiffs allege is politically motivated persecution by federal authorities.

Spearheaded by Jake Lang, a January 6 defendant who has been imprisoned for nearly four years, the January 6 Restitution and Wrongful Incarceration Lawsuit highlights claims of unjust treatment, inadequate legal representation, and unconstitutional detention conditions.

According to the lawsuit, set to be filed on January 20, 2025, the plaintiffs argue that the DOJ engaged in selective enforcement, disproportionately targeting individuals aligned with conservative ideologies, first reported by The Gateway Pundit. The group alleges a “weaponized justice system” that imposed heavy penalties on peaceful protesters, many of whom claim they were exercising their First Amendment rights.

“This isn’t just about restitution—it’s about setting a precedent,” said Lang, who founded the advocacy group Federal Watchdog. “Weaponized government and lawfare against conservatives can never become the standard in America.” Federal Watchdog claims that the FBI pursued plaintiffs who had protested at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, and described them as being “hunted down like animals.”

“Washington, DC – January, 6 2021: Trump supporters rioting at the US Capitol.”

The January 6 breach, following then-President Trump’s rally in Washington, D.C., marked one of the most significant security failures in modern American history. The event saw hundreds of people breach the Capitol, temporarily halting the certification of Joe Biden’s electoral victory. In its aftermath, federal prosecutors launched one of the largest investigations in U.S. history, leading to the indictment of over 1,000 individuals for offenses ranging from trespassing and vandalism to assaulting law enforcement and seditious conspiracy.

High-profile convictions included leaders of groups such as the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. While some cases resulted in plea agreements and prison sentences, others ignited debates over the balance between lawful protest and criminal actions. The breach also spurred broader political and legal consequences, including ongoing scrutiny of Trump’s role and related indictments concerning alleged efforts to overturn the election.

“Washington, DC – January, 6 2021: Trump supporters rioting at the US Capitol.”

“The damage to children who have spent four years without their fathers at home cannot be put into monetary value,” Lang said. “But we must being the healing process by holding those responsible for our unconstitutional cruel & unusual torture accountable! We’re standing up to secure restitution for the thousands of broken lives left in the wake of the January 6 persecution. This is about giving these families a chance to rebuild.”

The lawsuit cites a litany of grievances, including loss of family businesses, homes, careers, and years of emotional and psychological hardship. According to Lang, some prisoners experienced physical mistreatment in custody, while others faced severe mental health challenges due to prolonged incarceration.

WASHINGTON, DC – January 6, 2021: A man waves a Confederate battle flag while standing on a statue at the Ulysses S. Grant Memorial during a riot by supporters of Donald Trump at the U.S. Capitol.

Among the plaintiffs are fathers separated from their children for years and individuals whose health has significantly deteriorated during their imprisonment. The lawsuit argues these hardships resulted from what they describe as unconstitutional detention practices and the denial of fair trials.

The legal team representing the plaintiffs includes high-profile conservative attorneys such as Steven Metcalf, Anthony Sabatini, Stephanie Lambert, and Jonathan Gross. Together, they aim to not only secure financial restitution but also set a legal precedent against what they call “political lawfare.”

Critics of the DOJ’s handling of January 6 cases have long argued that the government’s response was disproportionate and politically motivated. Conservative lawmakers and commentators have pointed to leniency in other protest-related cases as evidence of unequal treatment.

YOURS FREE: Claim Your ‘Trump Victory’ Coin NOW!