Jaw-Dropping Twist In Kirk Assassin Tyler Robinson’s Trial Threatens Entire DA’s Office

Defense lawyers for Tyler Robinson, who is accused of assassinating Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk are pushing to knock the entire Utah County Attorney’s Office off the case, arguing a conflict of interest because an adult child of a prosecutor was present at the scene of the killing.

The request has sparked debate among legal experts, many of whom say the move is a stretch.

“This is one of those motions I find ridiculous,” said Donna Rotunno, a Chicago criminal defense attorney and Fox News contributor. “Normally I like to see a vigorous defense and attorneys doing everything they can to protect their client, but this is one that I find frivolous in nature.”

Tyler Robinson is charged with killing Kirk during a Turning Point event in Utah. His attorneys argue that the presence of a prosecutor’s family member at the scene taints the case. Rotunno said that claim falls flat unless the relationship directly impacts prosecutorial decisions.

“If the family member was the victim, then maybe this is an issue,” she said. “If Erika Kirk was related to a prosecutor, they would have more ground to stand on.”

Prosecutors can be recused when a genuine conflict threatens a defendant’s right to a fair trial, but legal analysts say that bar is high, even in a high-profile murder case that unfolded in front of a large crowd.

“The legal system takes conflicts of interest seriously, but a prosecutor isn’t automatically disqualified just because someone in their family witnessed a traumatic event connected to the case,” said Randolph Rice, a Baltimore-based attorney and legal analyst. “The key issue is whether that relationship creates a real risk that decisions are being driven by emotion instead of evidence.”

Courts typically require “a clear, direct conflict that threatens the defendant’s right to a fair trial” before disqualifying an entire prosecutor’s office, Rice said.

“At the same time, prosecutors also have a duty to avoid even the appearance of impropriety, especially in a high-profile capital case where public trust is already on edge,” he added.

The case carries the possibility of the death penalty, raising the stakes for Robinson’s defense. If the motion succeeds, a new prosecutorial team could reassess whether capital punishment should remain on the table.

“Getting this prosecutor or prosecutor’s office kicked off the case opens the possibility of a different state agency coming in and evaluating this case differently and possibly not seeking the death penalty,  which would be a huge win for Tyler Robinson‘s team and for him,” Rice said.

Utah County prosecutors fired back, arguing there is no personal conflict and that even if one existed, it would not justify removing the entire office. County Attorney Jeff Gray said the deputy prosecutor’s family connection played no role in his decision to seek the death penalty.

Court filings note that thousands of people witnessed the shooting and that prosecutors are not relying on the family member in question. They said the adult child had no direct line of sight to the rooftop sniper’s position and did not witness the actual killing.

Still, defense attorneys pointed out that during the chaos, the witness was texting with family members, including the prosecutor, a detail they argue raises concerns about appearances, even if it does not amount to a legal conflict.

Download the FREE Trending Politics App to get the latest news FIRST >>