JUST IN: National Guard Whistleblowers Are About To DESTROY The Democrats’ J6 Narrative

Whistleblowers are set to testify next week, offering new perspectives that could challenge the prevailing narrative surrounding the 2020 election. Officers from the Washington D.C. National Guard are set to provide evidence contradicting the narrative presented by the January 6 Committee. These whistleblowers claim they were ready to deploy on former President Donald Trump’s orders during the Capitol breach but were restrained by the Pentagon, a delay that may reshape public understanding of the events of that day.

Scheduled to testify next Wednesday before a House subcommittee, at least three National Guard officers will challenge previous assertions made by the January 6 Committee, which had been leading the investigation into the Capitol breach. The testimony is expected to assert that Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller had approved the deployment of the D.C. National Guard on Trump’s directive.

First reported by the Daily Mail, a source familiar with the House Administration Committee’s Oversight Subcommittee’s review stated that the whistleblowers would testify about a significant delay by then-Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy in issuing the formal order to National Guard Commander William Walker to mobilize troops. The delay, reportedly lasting at least two hours, prevented the immediate deployment of the Guard to the Capitol, contributing to the chaos and violence of the day.

“Whistleblowers from the Washington D.C. National Guard will tell Congress that Donald Trump did want them deployed during the Capitol riot and the Army delayed telling them to mobilize in a bombshell hearing next week.

Daily Mail can exclusively reveal that at least three…

— Oversight Subcommittee (@OversightAdmn) April 12, 2024

The hearing, “Three Years Later: D.C. National Guard Whistleblowers Speak Out on January 6 Delay,” aims to explore whether bureaucratic delays, rather than Trump’s actions, were responsible for the National Guard’s late arrival at the scene. This perspective challenges the January 6 Committee’s findings, which suggested Trump was complicit in exacerbating the violence by hindering a timely military response.

Further complicating the narrative, the whistleblowers allege that the January 6 Committee ignored their testimonies because it did not align with the predetermined narrative that sought to place the blame squarely on the former president. The officers, who were reportedly in full tactical gear and ready to move on January 6, will detail their hours-long wait for deployment orders that only came after significant delays according to the outlet.

Backlash against the January 6th Committee has stemmed from many political and ideological disagreements. Critics, primarily from the Republican Party, argue that the committee was partisan and aimed primarily at damaging the Republican Party and Trump. They contended that the committee’s work was one-sided, focusing excessively on Trump’s role in the events leading up to and on January 6, without examining broader security failures or other contributing factors.

Democrats and some Republicans have countered that the committee was crucial for understanding and documenting the unprecedented events on the Capitol and preventing future incidents. The divide continues to influence American politics.

Critics say that McCarthy, possibly vying for a position in President Joe Biden’s administration, was concerned about the optics of a military response under his command during the certification of the 2020 presidential election results. The concern might have influenced his decision-making process regarding the deployment of the National Guard.

The upcoming testimony of the officers could provoke serious questions about the integrity and conclusions of the January 6 investigation. It may also impact ongoing discussions about the necessary reforms to ensure a nonpartisan and effective response to national emergencies.