Politics

JUST IN: SCOTUS Blocks Rogue Judge, Gives Trump Admin A Massive Deportation Win

Published

1 week ago

April 7, 2025

The Supreme Court stepped in Monday evening to halt what the Trump administration called an unprecedented judicial power grab, temporarily pausing a federal judge’s order that demanded the U.S. government bring back a deported MS-13 gang member from a high-security prison in El Salvador.

Chief Justice John Roberts granted an emergency administrative stay, giving the administration breathing room as it fights a lower court’s order to return Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia — a Salvadoran national with verified gang ties — back to the United States by midnight Monday, according to Axios.

The Trump administration’s top legal voice, Solicitor General D. John Sauer, filed the appeal early Monday, accusing U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis of overstepping her authority and interfering with the president’s power to manage foreign policy and national security.

At the center of the legal clash is Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a native of El Salvador who was previously removed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. According to the Department of Justice, he is “a verified member of MS-13,” citing an immigration judge’s determination that a “past, proven, and reliable source of information” confirmed his gang affiliation.

Armando Abrego Garcia

Although Abrego Garcia had been granted withholding of removal to El Salvador in 2019, the Trump administration argued that relief was no longer valid after MS-13 was designated a foreign terrorist organization earlier this year. Solicitor General Sauer emphasized that “members of MS-13 are no longer eligible for withholding of removal.”

The emergency application submitted to the Supreme Court by Sauer described the lower court’s injunction as “remarkable,” saying the ruling “requires the United States to persuade El Salvador to release Abrego Garcia—a native of El Salvador detained in El Salvador—on a judicially mandated clock.”

“The Constitution charges the President, not federal district courts, with the conduct of foreign diplomacy and protecting the Nation against foreign terrorists,” Sauer wrote. “This order sets the United States up for failure.”

In fact, the administration argued that the U.S. government “does not control the sovereign nation of El Salvador, nor can it compel El Salvador to follow a federal judge’s bidding.”

The underlying order came from U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, who directed the federal government to “facilitate and effectuate the return of Plaintiff Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the United States by no later than 11:59 PM on Monday, April 7, 2025.”

But the Trump administration blasted the ruling as an unconstitutional overreach into foreign policy, noting that “district courts would effectively have extraterritorial jurisdiction over the United States’ diplomatic relations with the whole world” if this precedent were allowed to stand.

The administration also cited public safety concerns in the filing, stating: “The public interest supports vacating the order directing Abrego Garcia’s return to the United States.” They pointed to a previous immigration court ruling that denied Abrego Garcia’s bond due to gang ties, concluding he “failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that his release from custody would not pose a danger to others.”

The Supreme Court’s pause does not decide the merits of the case but signals that the justices may be inclined to side with the Trump administration on the broader question of judicial interference in immigration and diplomacy.