Connect with us

Politics

Michele Tafoya Torches Peggy Flanagan For Her Role In Sweeping Minnesota Fraud

Published

on

Republican Senate candidate Michele Tafoya hammered Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan over the state’s sprawling fraud scandal during a heated debate Friday, accusing the Democrat of dodging responsibility for billions in taxpayer losses under Gov. Tim Walz.

Tafoya, a former NFL sideline reporter, repeatedly challenged Flanagan’s record during the showdown, arguing that her nearly eight years as Minnesota’s second-highest-ranking elected official should make her accountable for the scandals that have engulfed state government.

“My opponent has been second in command in this state for eight years, drawing a taxpayer-funded paycheck. And what do we have to show for that? We have massive fraud, historic fraud. We have test scores down. We have crime spiking. We have a massive surplus turned into a deficit,” Tafoya said.

“This election is about Peggy Flanagan.”

Minnesota has faced mounting scrutiny over fraud involving taxpayer-funded food assistance, child care programs, health care services and other government initiatives. Federal and state investigators have uncovered schemes in which defendants allegedly billed public programs for services that were never provided or dramatically exaggerated the number of people receiving assistance.

Estimates of potential fraud across Minnesota programs have reached as high as $9 billion, although that figure has not been established as the amount actually stolen.

The controversy has become a major political liability for Democrats, particularly Walz, whose administration has faced questions about its handling of warnings and oversight failures.

Flanagan found herself facing those same questions Friday when a debate moderator asked whether she accepted “any ownership over the fraud.”

Rather than accepting direct responsibility, the lieutenant governor pointed to Walz.

“The governor has been very clear that the buck stops with him,” Flanagan said.

“He was the one who had oversight here. I’ve led on issues like paid family and medical leave, nation-leading child tax credit, making sure that kids get breakfast and lunch at school. Those are the things and those are the areas where I took the lead.”

The response gave Tafoya another opening.

After Flanagan attempted to shift the debate toward President Donald Trump, the Republican accused her opponent of trying to turn the Senate contest into a referendum on someone who was not running.

“Peggy, Donald Trump isn’t on the ballot. You and I are on the ballot, and only one of us let $9 billion walk out the door to fraud to suggest that we that she somehow is going to be a fraud czar all of a sudden,” Tafoya said.

WATCH:

POLL: Will You Support Trump And His Candidates In The Midterms?

“My goodness, she was second in charge in this state, and she’s just going to point her finger at Gov. Tim Walz when she demanded to be in the room where everything happened. But, suddenly, she has nothing to do with this. Again, sell it to someone else,” she added.

Flanagan, who took office alongside Walz in January 2019, has sought to distinguish her responsibilities as lieutenant governor from the agencies directly responsible for administering the programs at the center of the investigations.

But Tafoya argued that the distinction did little to excuse the administration’s record, making the fraud scandal a centerpiece of her case against the Democratic nominee.

Walz’s decision not to seek another term as governor came amid intense political scrutiny surrounding the fraud investigations. Flanagan had already entered the Senate race before his announcement.

The Democrat, meanwhile, continued targeting Trump’s involvement in the contest, pointing to his endorsement of Tafoya as evidence of her political alignment with the president.

“Donald Trump doesn’t just endorse anybody. In fact, he endorses against people in his own party if they dare to take him on. Michele Tafoya passed his litmus test with flying colors,” Flanagan said.

Tafoya also used the debate to outline how she would approach fraud enforcement in Washington, calling for deportation of noncitizens convicted of defrauding Americans, tougher prison sentences and greater federal scrutiny of states that fail to safeguard taxpayer funds.

“No. 1, if you’re a guest of this country, and you defraud Americans, you must leave. You must leave, and you should have no pathway back,” she said.

“No. 2, if you’re an American and you defraud your fellow Americans, we should be talking about mandatory prison minimums. Tough sentences, not an easygoing slap on the wrist.

“And No. 3, if you’re a state like Minnesota who cannot keep your financial house in order, why would the federal government release billions and billions of dollars to you, only to see it go to fraud?”

The exchange underscored the sharply different strategies emerging in Minnesota’s Senate race. Tafoya is seeking to make the election a judgment on Democratic leadership in the state, while Flanagan is emphasizing her legislative priorities and attempting to tie her Republican opponent to Trump.

Both candidates secured their respective party nominations earlier this year and will face voters in the Nov. 3 general election.

POLL: Would You Vote Against ANY Candidate Who Calls Themselves A Socialist?