MUST-SEE: Tim Walz Gets Caught In Major Scandal During Brutal House Grilling

Gov. Tim Walz took a beating on Capitol Hill as House Republicans zeroed in on one of the most politically damaging facts in Minnesota’s sprawling fraud scandal: his administration restarted payments to Feeding Our Future, then blamed the court for it,  only to be publicly corrected by the court itself. The confrontation became one of the sharpest moments in the House Oversight Committee’s latest hearing on fraud and misuse of federal funds in Minnesota.

Chairman James Comer opened the hearing by accusing Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison of presiding over “one of the most extensive breakdowns of oversight this Committee has ever examined,” saying whistleblowers raised alarms for years while billions in taxpayer dollars kept flowing out the door. Comer’s office said federal prosecutors estimate up to $9 billion may have been stolen from 14 Medicaid programs in Minnesota, and the committee’s interim report alleges senior state officials were warned repeatedly and failed to act.

But the exchange that really cut through came when Rep. Jim Jordan put Walz on the spot over Feeding Our Future, the pandemic-era food aid scandal that federal prosecutors say turned into a roughly $250 million fraud scheme. Jordan pressed Walz on why payments were restarted after fraud concerns had already been raised, and why Walz publicly suggested the state’s hand had been forced by a judge. That line has long been a problem for Walz,  because the judge flatly said it was false.

The Minnesota court’s own public statement could not have been clearer. Judge John Guthmann “never ordered the Department of Education to resume payments to FOF in April 2021, or at any other time,” the court said. It added that the department “voluntarily resumed making payments” and that all reimbursement payments to Feeding Our Future were made “without any court order.” The court said the statement was issued specifically because of “inaccurate statements by the Governor” and others.

That is what made Jordan’s line of attack so brutal. Walz tried to fall back on the explanation that agency lawyers believed the court required the payments. But by that point, the underlying problem was obvious: somebody told the public a judge forced the state to turn the money back on, and the judge himself later said that never happened. Republicans argued Walz was trying to hide behind the court rather than admit his administration made the call.

The broader scandal has become a political nightmare for Walz. The first hearing in January featured testimony that fraud warnings were documented, repeated and ignored. This week’s hearing raised the temperature further by putting Walz and Ellison under oath while congressional Republicans worked to tie Minnesota’s fraud explosion directly to failures at the top.

For Walz, that is the real danger. It is not just that fraud happened on his watch. It is that when he finally had to answer for it, Republicans were able to point to a court statement saying his public explanation was false. That is the kind of moment that sticks, not because of partisan spin, but because it is simple, direct and hard to explain away.

Download the FREE Trending Politics App to get the latest news FIRST >>