NEW: Trump Attempts Rare Legal Maneuver During Trial

As Donald Trump’s hush money trial progresses in a New York courtroom, the former president is seeking an unconventional legal strategy by requesting to participate personally in sidebar conversations, a move rarely seen from defendants in criminal trials.

The trial, which centers on allegations that Trump paid hush money to silence affairs, is drawing attention not only for its high-profile defendant but also for the unique legal maneuvers being employed. With jury selection imminent, the atmosphere in the courtroom has been charged with anticipation.

According to CNN, Trump’s request to join sidebar discussions — typically private conversations between the judge and lawyers — was highlighted by his legal team on Monday. Such conversations often involve sensitive matters that may not be suitable for public airing, and traditionally, only attorneys and the judge participate directly. The case against Trump got off to a rocky start as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was denied the opportunity to present one of his key pieces of character evidence.

The trial has already seen its share of drama; Judge Juan Merchan ruled that the controversial “Access Hollywood” tape, in which Trump made lewd comments about women, cannot be shown to jurors. However, testimony from individuals allegedly involved with Trump, including a model who claims to have had an affair with him, has been allowed. Prosecutors are also pushing for penalties against Trump for allegedly violating a gag order.

WATCH:

The decision to potentially allow Trump to engage in sidebar conversations is pending, with the judge considering the implications of such a precedent. Legal analysts suggest that Trump’s presence could intimidate jurors or influence their perceptions. The trial’s outcomes could have significant political and legal repercussions for Trump, who faces multiple investigations and potential trials across the country.

The New York case specifically has stirred nationwide discussions about the boundaries of presidential immunity.

Whether or not the judge grants Trump’s request could influence courtroom dynamics significantly, potentially affecting the jury’s attitude and the overall atmosphere of the trial.

Another critical piece of evidence denied includes a video from E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case where the former president suffered an $84 million judgment against him. Carroll maintained that Trump sexually assaulted her decades ago.

As he prepared for the start of his first criminal trial, Trump sought to leverage his appearance in court to benefit his campaign, releasing a video on Truth Social and X in which he described the prosecution’s intent to silence him because they are part of a Democratic machine attempting to silence his supporters on Election Day.

“They will try to take away my freedom because I will never let them take away your freedoms,” Trump tells a thunderous crowd. “They will try to silence me because I will never let them silence you. They want you silent, and I’m the only one who can save this nation because you know they’re not coming after me, they’re coming after you.”

“When I walk into that courtroom, I know I will have the love of 200 million Americans behind me, and I will be FIGHTING for the FREEDOM of 325 MILLION AMERICANS!” Trump wrote on Truth Social.