Connect with us

Politics

Top Newspaper Snubs Kamala, Refuses To Endorse Democrat For First Time Since 2004

Published

on

In an unprecedented move, the Los Angeles Times, a publication known for its consistent support of Democratic candidates, has opted not to endorse any presidential contender in the 2024 election. This decision marks the first time since 2004 that the newspaper has withheld its endorsement, diverging from a long-standing tradition. The owner of the Los Angeles Times reportedly influenced the decision, directing the editorial board to refrain from backing a candidate this cycle.

Earlier in the year, the LA Times published their list of endorsements. “It’s no exaggeration to say this may be the most consequential election in a generation. And we’re not just talking about the presidential race. From the top of the ticket to local ballot measures, California voters this year are grappling with major decisions that will shape their lives and communities for years to come,” the newspaper wrote.

“To help voters decide, the Times editorial board offers recommendations based on interviewing candidates, campaign committees and policy experts, examining facts and claims and doing research to inform our endorsements.” Endorsements ranged from Propositions, Council Members, to Senators. No presidential endorsement was included.

An LA Times spokesperson conveyed to Semafor, “We do not comment on internal discussions or decisions about editorials or endorsements.” However, insiders revealed that Terry Tang, the executive editor, informed the editorial board staff earlier in the month that the newspaper would not endorse any candidate in this presidential election. This directive reportedly originated from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the owner of the paper and a wealthy healthcare industry magnate.

While the LA Times did not provide a specific reason for this decision, a note on their online endorsement page clarifies, “the editorial board endorses selectively, choosing the most consequential races in which to make recommendations.”

Until now, the Los Angeles Times, one of the most influential newspapers in the United States, has maintained a consistent pattern in its presidential endorsements over the past elections, invariably supporting Democratic candidates. The endorsement of Barack Obama in both 2008 and 2012 further showed the newspaper’s alignment with progressive political figures.

In 2016, the Times threw its support behind Hillary Clinton, highlighting her extensive experience in government and advocacy for an inclusive America, as well as her potential to be the first female president. However, this endorsement also came during one of the most polarizing elections in recent history, with Clinton facing Donald Trump. Most recently, in 2020, the newspaper endorsed Joe Biden.

free hat

Since acquiring the publication in 2018, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong has a history of bypassing the editorial board’s decisions. This pattern was evident in 2020 when, despite the board’s deliberations, the paper hosted interviews with Democratic presidential candidates with the aim of endorsing a contender in the race.

In 2022, Politico reported tensions between the Times and its billionaire owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong, and his family, particularly his daughter, Nika Soon-Shiong. Journalists were reportedly concerned about potential interference from the owners, especially regarding political endorsements and editorial decisions. There have been struggles with leadership dynamics, as Kevin Merida, the executive editor, worked to modernize the paper amidst ownership-related uncertainties.

(POLL: Should Pelosi Be Banned From Trading Stocks?)