Connect with us

Politics

WATCH: Tucker Carlson Leaves Piers Morgan Stuttering In Fiery Debate

Published

on

In a video posted on X, Tucker Carlson and Piers Morgan engaged in a heated debate over NATO’s controversial military intervention in Yugoslavia. In the clip, Carlson pressed Morgan on whether the alliance’s actions were truly defensive. The fiery exchange quickly went viral, as Morgan struggled to defend his position while Carlson dismantled his arguments point by point.

The confrontation began when Morgan asserted that “NATO is a defensive organization.” Carlson immediately challenged the claim, asking, “How is it defensive?” Morgan, appearing caught off guard, insisted that NATO “has never acted proactively aggressively.”

Carlson wasted no time exposing the flaw in that statement. “Really? Where were you when the Yugoslavia war was going on? And they were bombing the [expletive] out of Christians in Yugoslavia. Do you remember that?” he asked.

While NATO is often portrayed as a purely defensive alliance, its military interventions—such as the 1999 bombing campaign in Yugoslavia—have led many to question whether the organization has strayed from its original mission.  The bombing was a military intervention led by the U.S. and its allies in response to the Kosovo War, a conflict between Serbian forces and ethnic Albanian separatists in the province of Kosovo.

Morgan, struggling to maintain his argument, responded, “That was pretty offensive… but NATO has always operated in a defensive capacity.” Carlson pressed further, questioning, “Really? That’s how they created Kosovo? Defensively?”

Morgan doubled down, insisting the alliance had acted in self-defense, but Carlson wasn’t buying it. “Who was the aggressor there?” he asked. Morgan attempted to sidestep the question, mentioning that his brother-in-law was present during the conflict.

Carlson didn’t let him off the hook, cutting through the deflection. “What you’re saying is insane,” he responded, calling on Morgan to acknowledge NATO’s offensive actions.

Morgan attempted to recover, claiming that NATO had “never actually acted unilaterally” or attacked anyone without provocation. Carlson then delivered the knockout blow: “Who in Yugoslavia attacked NATO?” he asked, leaving Morgan with no real response.

Carlson didn’t let up, urging Morgan to acknowledge his flawed reasoning. “This is the point where you just admit defeat,” he said. “Bow your head and be like, you know what, I bow before superior knowledge. I totally got this wrong. I can’t believe I had such a silly idea.”

WATCH:

0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

The war was rooted in long-standing ethnic tensions between Serbs and Albanians, with Kosovo, a historically significant region for Serbia, experiencing growing demands for independence from its Albanian-majority population. The conflict escalated in the late 1990s as the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), an ethnic Albanian paramilitary group, launched attacks on Serbian security forces, prompting a harsh crackdown by the government of then-Yugoslav President Slobodan Milošević.

Reports of mass killings, ethnic cleansing, and human rights abuses against Kosovo Albanians led NATO to justify military action without United Nations approval, marking the first time the alliance launched an offensive operation against a sovereign state. From March 24 to June 10, 1999, NATO conducted an extensive bombing campaign against Serbian military targets, infrastructure, and key government facilities across Yugoslavia, including in the capital, Belgrade.

The strikes led to significant civilian casualties and damage, with critics arguing that NATO’s intervention violated international law and set a dangerous precedent for military action without a UN mandate. The bombing ultimately forced Milošević to withdraw Serbian forces from Kosovo, leading to the establishment of a UN-administered territory and, later, Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence in 2008.

The intervention remains a controversial chapter in NATO history.