Connect with us

Politics

‘Election Interference’: Alina Habba Lays Out Suspicious Timeline Of Trump Indictments, Biden Corruption Bombshells

Published

on

Alina Habba, an attorney for former President Donald trump, laid out the questionable timeline of Trump indictments being announced immediately after key evidence of Biden family corruption emerges.

“On March 17, Hunter accidentally admits that it was his laptop from hell. The next day, [Manhattan] DA Alvin Bragg indicts President Trump,” Habba told reporters outside federal court in Washington D.C. on Thursday. “June 8, an FBI document is released showing that the Ukrainians paid the Biden crime family millions and millions of dollars. The next day, the Mar-A-Lago indictment.”

“Last week, Hunter Biden’s sweetheart plea deal fell through when the judge realized it had blanket immunity. The following day, a superseding indictment against Donald Trump,” Habba continued. “July 31st, Devon Archer goes to testify in front of the House. That was only after they failed to put him in jail prior to the fact. What happens the next day? The January 6th indictment that we’re here for today.”

“This is not a coincidence, this is election interference at its finest against the leading candidate right now for president, for either party” Trump’s lawyer went on to say.


A number of conservative pundits and neutral legal experts have pointed to the questionable timeline of charges against Trump being announced immediately following bad news for President Biden.

Over the past several weeks and months, elected Republicans have released a steady drip of evidence linking the Biden family to an influence peddling scheme involving the Ukrainian energy giant Burisma, where Hunter Biden sat on the board. Just this week, Hunter’s longtime business partner, Devon Archer, testified to lawmakers that the “Biden brand” was what kept Burisma in business.

free hat

He later told Tucker Carlson that Hunter Biden was “selling access” while sitting on the board, which was the only reason he had his seat in the first place.

Despite the growing mountain of evidence against the White House’s current occupant, the Trump legal saga continues to be the main focus for mainstream media outlets and elected Democrats. In one example, the New York Times failed to include any mention of Devon Archer’s testimony on their homepage on the day of the interview.