Connect with us

Politics

Trump Might Get Bailed Out in Grand Jury Trial After Head Juror Shows Extreme Bias During Giddy Interview

Published

on

On Wednesday morning, Foreperson Juror Emily Kohrs in Trump GA Grand Jury went on a media tour and showed her extreme bias against President Trump, and it just might get him out of any trouble. If the 45th President does get indicted, these interviews may almost certainty let him off the hook because experts are calling this “a prosecutors nightmare”.

Watch her giddily talk about how she would have liked to subpoena Trump:

“Did you personally want to hear from the former President?” asked the MSNBC interviewer.

“I wanted to hear from the former President, but honestly, I kind of wanted to subpoena the former President because I got to swear everybody in, so I thought it would be really cool to get 60 seconds with President Trump, of me looking at him and being like ‘do you solemnly swear’ and me getting to swear him in, I just feel like that would have been an awesome moment,” she said with creepy smiles the entire time.

Even CNN is sounding the alarm, saying this is a prosecutors nightmare:

free hat

Here’s another bizarre video of her making giddy and weird faces talking about how many people will be indicted:

UPDATE:

Lawyers representing Republican witnesses in the investigation of former President Donald Trump and his colleagues in Fulton County may try to stop possible indictments.

District attorney Fani Willis is currently deciding whether to pursue charges and convene a criminal grand jury based on the special grand jury’s findings.

Emily Kohrs, the forewoman of the grand jury investigating former President Donald Trump and his allies in Fulton County, Georgia, was seen laughing during media appearances. Critics of the grand jury’s investigation saw Kohrs’ demeanor as evidence of bias against Trump and his allies.

However, supporters of the investigation noted that Kohrs was not authorized to speak about the grand jury’s findings and that her demeanor was irrelevant to the investigation’s outcome. The grand jury’s report remains sealed, and it is not yet clear whether any charges will be pursued.

Many people have criticized Emily Kohrs, the forewoman of the grand jury investigating former President Donald Trump for speaking to the media about the investigation. Her interviews could be used by Trump’s defense team that might indicate a bias against the former president.

Some have suggested that it would have been wiser for Kohrs to wait until after any potential indictments before speaking out. It is important to remember that Kohrs was not authorized to discuss the grand jury’s findings and that her demeanor during media appearances could be used to draw conclusions about the investigation’s validity. The decision to pursue charges based on the grand jury’s findings remains in the hands of the district attorney, and it is unclear whether any charges will be filed.